logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.12.21 2015고정2675
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the Gyeonggi-do Livestock Cooperative and a person who operates E in Ma in Macheon-si.

The defendant has conspiredd with a veterinarian and a sales intermediary to acquire livestock disaster insurance proceeds operated with 50% of the government subsidies.

On July 9, 2012, in E located in Spocheon-si D, the Defendant: (a) sent milch (F) of the Defendant’s possession at normal stables; and (b) issued a false medical certificate that only the No-A-A-A-B-B-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C

Therefore, it received KRW 520,360 from the injured insurance company that believed this as a genuine document on July 24, 2012, such as receiving KRW 520,360 from the insurance money on July 24, 2012, and received KRW 6,505,130 in total over 10 times as in the list of crimes.

In this respect, livestock disaster insurance money was acquired through illegal means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police statement made to I, J, and K;

1. A copy of the text of the Decision 2017No. 1489, and a copy of the summary order issued by the Speaker's District Court 2015 High Court 18308 High Court

1. Copies of the examination record of L/C 441 High Court Order 2015 High Court Order 441 L/C 2015 High Court Order 2519 I, J and K 2519 High Court Order 2015, each one copy of the examination record of H 395 High Court Order 2016

1. Documents claiming insurance proceeds;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel denied the charge of the instant case, but each of the instant cattle was prepared by the veterinarian L, etc. as a non-permanent cattle, but did not actually be slaughtered due to non-a non-permanent cattle, and the Defendant did not enter into a direct sales contract with the sales market even if the contract was not entered into.

arrow