logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.05.17 2016고단716
사기
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who operates a stock farm located in Pyeongtaek-si F.

The defendant has received insurance money by submitting a false medical certificate, sales contract, photograph, etc. to the insurance company for the purpose of receiving insurance money from livestock disaster insurance proceeds operated with 50% of the government subsidies.

On January 20, 201, the Defendant: (a) prepared a false contract for the purchase and sale of any non-permanent cattle to KRW 100,000 so that he/she can file a claim for insurance proceeds from H, a seller, even though the milk (number G: G) owned by the Defendant was no more than the value of the goods, such as flame retardant, within the farm located in Pyeongtaek-si F, and filed a written diagnosis with the Defendant that he/she purchased the non-permanent cattle to KRW 100,00,00; and (b) filed a claim for insurance proceeds on February 14, 2011, with the Defendant’s non-permanent cattle to be seen as a non-permanent cattle (belled cattle) by attaching the photograph of the cattle he/she sited to the Defendant.

Therefore, on February 17, 201, the insurer received 792,00 won of insurance money from the insurer.

In such a way, the Defendant was given KRW 11,695,140 over nine times in total as the list of crimes.

2. Defendant B is a person operating a stock farm located in Pyeongtaek-si J in Gyeonggi-si.

The defendant has received insurance money by submitting a false medical certificate, sales contract, photograph, etc. to the insurance company for the purpose of receiving insurance money from livestock disaster insurance proceeds operated with 50% of the government subsidies.

Although the Defendant’s milch (e.g., number: K) owned by the Defendant in Pyeongtaek-si J did not have any value of the goods, such as flame retardant, the Defendant prepared a false contract for the purchase and sale of the non-permanent cattle to claim insurance money from H, a seller, and issued a diagnosis of the non-permanent cattle from the number of private individuals I, and affixed a photograph of the cattle to the non-permanent cattle (type).

arrow