A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Seized evidence 1 (vehicle number plates) shall be confiscated from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court Sejong Housing Site Board, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 7, 2012, and is currently under a suspended sentence period.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant, on the grounds of local tax delinquency, was subject to seizure of the front number plate of CA car owned by himself, was able to forge it and attach it to a car. On August 10, 2013, the Defendant copied from the inter-disorder points located in Pyeongtaek-si Seo-dong, the number plate made by inserting the number plate “C” in white on a green-based basis, and affixed it in front of the said car. On February 7, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car with a forged number plate attached as above, and driven approximately 1 km from the front of the west-ri National Road No. 1, Han-ri, Han-ri.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising the right, the defendant forged the public office's marks, and exercised them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure record and list;

1. Voluntary production number plate photographs;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of criminal records, one copy of written judgment, and Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal investigation reports (attached to the previous sentence and written judgment);

1. Article 238 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, committed a crime of forging a private document as indicated in the judgment of the court below, and thus, committed a crime of forging and uttering the air defense of this case, the statutory punishment of which is limited to imprisonment, despite the fact that the Defendant committed a crime of forging and uttering, as stated in the judgment of the court below, and as such, it is inevitable to sentence sentence since he arbitrarily produced a forged air sign

Provided, That the punishment shall be determined as per the order in consideration of the fact that the defendant is recognized to commit the crime and the family relationship of the defendant.