logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.10.10 2019고단765
영유아보육법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No subsidy shall be granted, or shall be appropriated, by fraud or other improper means, and no coupons for nursing services shall be used unlawfully.

1. The Defendant, as the principal of the C Child Care Center in Pakistan, was in charge of raising the child at home, and the child was in charge of raising the child at home, while the child was in charge of raising the child at home, on the other hand, a maximum of KRW 900,000 if the child was in charge of providing the child care to the child care center, requesting a false registration of the child who was not born to the child’s parents and thus, proposed to return the amount equivalent to the child care allowances originally receivable to the parents of the child. The Defendant recruited to register the child with the said child care center falsely.

Around June 1, 2018, the Defendant conspired with the above D, E, F, G, and H, and even if the Defendant did not actually take care of the childcare center, the Defendant registered the child I (J) into the childcare integration system, and received 437,000 basic childcare fees, which are subsidies, by claiming subsidies, such as childcare fees, from around June 2018 to around July of the same year. In collusion with the above children’s parents, the Defendant received 34,000 child care fees, and received 344,000 child care fees, and used the right to use childcare services, as stated in the attached Table 1, the Defendant’s application for changes in the indictment on August 27, 2019, stating that the sum of the basic childcare fees is 14,140,350 won, and that the Defendant’s application for changes in the indictment is obviously false, 35,000 won, and that the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense, as stated in the attached Table 1.

arrow