logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.11 2017나86714
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff (appointed party) in the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations by the court of first instance, and even if the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance submitted to this court, each of the evidence Nos. 31 through 40 (including each number of evidence with a serial number) is presented to the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment by the court of first instance are deemed legitimate.

Accordingly, the court's explanation on the instant case is between the two pages 19 and 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

D. On November 6, 2017, A, who was the Plaintiff, died on the part of November 6, 2017 during the instant lawsuit, taken over the litigation procedures of the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Intervenor (Appointed Party), R, S, and T on December 21, 2017 (hereinafter “the deceased”). Furthermore, “Plaintiff and the designated Party” in the third part of the judgment of the first instance shall be “Plaintiff (Appointed Party)” and “Plaintiff and the appointed Party” in the third part of the judgment of the first instance, “Plaintiff” in the third part of the judgment of the first instance, “Plaintiff and the appointed Party” in the third part of the judgment of the first instance, “Plaintiff” in the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance, “Plaintiff” in the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance, and “Plaintiff” in the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance shall be “the deceased Party” and “Plaintiff” in the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance, “the Plaintiff’s heir and the appointed Party” in the fourth part of the judgment of the judgment of the first instance.

2. If so, all of the claims of the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party are dismissed, without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the appeal by the plaintiff (appointed party) is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow