1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation in this case are as follows: "Plaintiff C, 3, 16, 4, and 13 of the first instance court's ruling" are as follows: "Plaintiff C, 4, 17, 5, 6, 17, 18, and 20 of the first instance court's ruling" are as follows: "Plaintiff C, 4, 17, 18, and 20 of the second instance court's ruling" (designated party's item, 6, 5 of the second instance court's testimony and fact inquiry about the Busan Metropolitan City's testimony of witness L and the results of the fact inquiry about the duty to submit tax information to the director of the tax office of North Busan Busan District, even if there are standards for the duty to submit taxation information against the director of the tax office of the first instance's office of the first instance court's decision, it is insufficient to recognize that there is any lack of sufficient grounds for the court's determination as it is in accordance with Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the appeal by the plaintiff (appointed party) is dismissed as it is without merit.