beta
Text
1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded by this court, is modified as follows.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On February 2011, the Plaintiff operating printing and advertising materials production business with the trade name called “CTPP” was engaged in the transaction of supplying printed materials, etc. from around February 2, 201 to around May 201, the amount of KRW 107,775,644 in total among the Defendant from around June 2015 to around May 2016 includes KRW 1,244,410 in collection fees related to the application for provisional seizure against real estate, etc. on November 2015, but there is no dispute between the parties.
A reasonable amount of “CTPP” supplied printed materials, etc., but did not receive KRW 107,775,644 (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s Claim”) from the Defendant.
B. Meanwhile, from November 10, 2012 to July 2017, the Plaintiff operated C with an office 105 square meters (hereinafter “instant office”) among the 1st floor of the building D on the ground owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant office”) and paid the Defendant electric charges and public charges incurred by the use of the instant office. The electric charges and public charges not paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant amounting to KRW 65,507,827 in total, including electric charges of KRW 62,845,801, water supply and drainage charges of KRW 2,62,02,06, and water supply and drainage charges of KRW 2,507,827,000 (hereinafter “the foregoing electric charges and water supply charges of this case, etc.”), which were not paid by the Defendant from the Plaintiff. [Grounds for recognition] The purport of the entire pleadings is as follows: (a) lack of dispute; (b) evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6 (including each number); and (c) Nos. 2 through 14 through 17
2. We examine the determination as to the cause of the claim. The Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with printed materials, etc. equivalent to the sum of KRW 107,775,644 from June 2015 to May 2016, but did not receive the price of the goods from the Defendant. However, according to the above recognition, the Defendant did not have any special circumstances.