beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. The plaintiffs' assertion
A. The Plaintiffs supplied the goods to the LABE as follows, but did not receive the price.
1) On December 30, 2012, the Plaintiff-General Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. supplied KRW 10,500,500,000, and KRW 18,000, and KRW 31,90,000, and KRW 31,90,000, and KRW 13,00, and KRW 13,00,00, respectively, supplied KRW 5,550,50,000 among the total amount of the above goods, but Plaintiff-General Co., Ltd received KRW 45,50,00,000, and did not receive the remainder of KRW 45,50,00,00,000 from Plaintiff-General Co., Ltd., Ltd., but did not receive KRW 10,500,000,00 from Plaintiff-General on January 30, 2013.
(3) Until December 30, 2012, Plaintiff A supplied KRW 8,250,00 with KRW 8,250 by December 30, 2012, the amount of the goods purchased by the Plaintiff and the amount of the claim for the goods purchased by the Plaintiff (the amount of the goods claimed by the Plaintiff is inconsistent with that of the Plaintiff) and KRW 18,250,00. However, the Defendants’ responsibilities were not paid in full. (2) Defendant CFE, the representative director of the LAF, the KAF, established the KAF and operated as the representative director on March 27, 2013, and changed the trade name on March 27, 2013 to the “CBF” (Defendant 1.) and moved the location to the “Seoul G” and continued to operate the business until now.
The LAF, the LAF, and the defendant C shall be the same corporation in fact.
Therefore, each of the above commodity price debt to the plaintiffs in the K-A-A-A-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U
2 Defendant D promised to pay each of the goods price to the plaintiffs as the representative director of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., but in fact, Defendant D had not been able to pay the goods price to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. or Defendant D, but had not been able to pay the goods price.
Defendant D is a tortfeasor who has committed deception against the plaintiffs, and is obligated to pay the price for each of the above goods to the plaintiffs in collaboration with the defendant CBA.
2. Whether the Defendants are liable.