beta
Text
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 727,454,167 and KRW 201,00,000 among them, from September 23, 2016, KRW 526,454,167.
Reasons
Basic Facts
A. The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff is a cooperative that obtained authorization from the head of Gangnam-gu Office to implement a reconstruction project on the land and on the ground of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-dong, and the Defendant is a contractor that received a contract from the Plaintiff for the construction of 397 reconstruction apartment units (hereinafter “instant apartment”) (hereinafter “instant construction”).
B. On June 29, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works and approval for provisional use (hereinafter “instant contract for construction works”) with the Defendant.
(2) On February 26, 2013, the instant apartment was approved for temporary use by the head of Gangnam-gu Office under Article 29 of the former Housing Act (amended by Act No. 13805, Jan. 19, 2016) and Article 36 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act. Since that time, the owners of the instant apartment began to move into the instant apartment.
C. 1) The Defendant did not construct the parts to be built in accordance with the design drawing regarding the apartment of this case, or changed the parts to be constructed differently from the defective construction or design drawing, thereby causing a number of defects in each building of this case. 2) The Plaintiff requested the Defendant to repair several times from October 14, 2014. However, the apartment of this case still shows a difference in the remuneration cost calculation by the defect list by the defect list by the section for exclusive use and the remuneration cost calculation by the defect list by the section for exclusive use and by the defect list by the defect list by the section for exclusive use. However, even though the appraisal results indicate that the remuneration cost for each of the above attached parts exceeds the original cost, it is merely a difference that occurred from leaving the amount less than the original cost.
The same defect as each description remains, and in order to repair it, it is after the rupture of outer wall.