logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.19 2015가합20723
하자보수에 갈음하는 손해배상
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 588,874,558 among the Plaintiff and KRW 583,50,000 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 5,374,558 from December 15, 2015 to KRW 5,374,558.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is an autonomous management body consisting of representatives of occupants for the management of 8 Dong 450 households, which is an aggregate building located in Yongsan-si, Suwon-si, 1-ro, 216, which is an aggregate building (hereinafter “instant apartment”). The Defendant is an executor who sells the instant apartment, and the Dong sub-construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Dong sub-construction”) is a contractor who constructed the instant apartment after being awarded a contract from the Defendant for the construction of the instant apartment.

B. On September 24, 2010, the Defendant obtained the approval for the use of the instant apartment from the Yongsan City.

C. 1) In the construction of the apartment of this case, the construction of the same sub-construction did not construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing, or altered the construction or defective construction differently from the design drawing. Accordingly, the apartment of this case caused the defect in the section for common use and section for exclusive use. 2) The apartment of this case

1. Calculation table of repair cost by defect list of the section for common use and attached Table;

2. There are defects, such as each description of the repair cost calculation table by the defect list of sections for exclusive use (hereinafter “instant defects”), the overall statement of the repair cost is as follows (excluding the partial design standard and the parts that are not recognized as defects in Section 2.b. 1 below among the defects alleged by the Plaintiff, excluding the parts that are not recognized as defects in each of the above separate sheets even if it is not determined separately below, which is the sum of the parts less than the cost of each item after dumping.

Of the apartment of this case, the cost of repairing the defects in the section for exclusive use by the household that did not transfer the damage claim in lieu of the defect repair to the Plaintiff is attached Form.

3. Unexecution of defective works which include the sum of the cost of repairing defects before the classification and classification of the relevant amounts entered in the table of cost of repairing defects of the portion that has not been transferred to the bonds.

arrow