logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.09 2014나29512
보험금직접지급청구
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court shall explain this part of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except in the following cases: the 3th to 19th, and the 3th to 11th, respectively, are as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 402 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Attachment 3 to 19] Na, comprehensively taking account of the evidence and the purport of the argument as stated in the evidence Nos. 2 and 3 which occurred prior to the occurrence of liability for damages, the driver of the so-called excavation searcher in this case is negligent in stopping at the corner of four lanes at the corner of four lanes on the west of Bora, Boraon Road, so the plaintiff, the insurer of the so-called excavation searcher in this case, is liable to compensate for damages caused by the accident in this case. Da. [The part used for the 5th parallel 3 to 11] d. The accident in this case occurred before sunset, and the accident in this case occurred from the 19th parallel to the 19th parallel, and the accident in this case is difficult to be deemed to have serious obstacles to the view of the 10th parallel and the second parallel, and in fact, the other vehicles in this case were at least 10% of the negligence of the plaintiff in this case and 20% of the damages caused by the accident in this case.

arrow