logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.11.30 2017고단579
무고등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of one million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2017 Highest 579" is a person who was operating "C" in Ansan-si B during the period of Ansan-si, and D was a person who was an employee of "C".

The Defendant, around 03:00 on August 20, 2010, put in a trial with the E and drinking value as a customer to the above “C,” and the Defendant, on his own, had the Defendant contracted for a drinking-related disease, and had E make a false statement as if he had been suffering from a drinking-related disease to the Defendant, and had E be subject to criminal punishment. During the so-called period, upon receiving a report at around 112 on the said day, he was sent to G and H with police officers belonging to the F District of the police station, and “E Mac-related World Cup was put in the wall,” and “I will this year?

“Creation of fears, such as threatening, etc., and destruction of beer’s disease on the floor of the mentmen, thereby wearing a plaque.

“Around August 29, 2010, the fact of damage was stated in the content and continued to be present at the criminal police station and the I Team office of the police station and the I Team during the limit of 01:04 on August 29, 2010, “E Mick was left towards the toilet with one beer and one cupped on the wall of the toilet, and again, I tried to see in the front.

“In addition to the statement made by the content of “D”, the said D made a statement to the effect that E attempted to put the Defendant on the Maercer’s disease, and that Macer’s disease was faced with the wall, and that D made the said statement to the effect that D had been exposed to the wall, on December 22, 2010, from the phone call with the Prosecutor General of the Military Prosecutors’ Office of the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office, the said D made the statement with the same content.

However, the facts are as follows: (a) the defendant enters the room located in E and C; and (b) the defendant entered the room.

During the process of putting the beer, the beer's disease, which had been in the place of the beer's disease, was broken to the wall of the toilet, and there was no fact that E has broken the beer's disease, etc. or threatened the defendant with beer's disease.

This is the defendant.

arrow