(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.10.26 2014고단4026

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.10.26 2014고단4026

부정수표단속법위반등

Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by one year of imprisonment and a fine of 1,000,000 won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 4026]

1. Violation of the Illegal Election Control Act;

A. On February 1009, the Defendant: (a) around January 10, 1998, from the influence of the trade name in the north-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City; (b) around January 10, 1998, the check number C in the column of the year among the date of issuance of a check in the front of the check number C 1 million won issued by the office of volcanonam-do, Do; (c) around 144, the Defendant stated that the check was issued in 100,000,000 won in the front of the check; and (d) stated that the check was issued in 10,000 won after the end of the month’s “1” and stated the “0,000 in flusium.”

B. Around January 10, 1998 at the above time and place, the Defendant 1 took 1,00,000 won check number D’s 1,00,000 won of the check number D issued by the above volcanic post office and stated “198” in the column of the year as “2008,” and stated that the period during which the check was issued was “2008,000,” and added “1” to “11,000,000,000 won.

(c)

Around January 10, 1998, the Defendant stated that the check E issued by the above volcanic post office was “2008” on the “1,998, the 1,000,000 won of the check E, which was issued by him at the above office of volcano, and stated that it was “208” on the “198,” the date of the issuance of the check, and that the starting year was “2008.”

(d)

In this respect, the Defendant changed the three chapters of the check.

2. Around 20:00 on February 25, 2009, the Defendant: (a) issued three copies of the check in one million won, which was modified as described in paragraph 1, at the victim G management in the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City on February 25, 200; and (b) issued a genuine check issued while purchasing money and valuables.

However, in fact, the three copies of the said check had already been reported to be lost, and it was not a check that can be settled normally as a check which received a judgment of nullification.

The defendant's 150,000 won of the market price owned by the victim from the injured party is one gold bling.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.06.14 2016고단860

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.05.31 2017고단106

-울산지방법원 2017.04.18 2017고단229

-부산지방법원 서부지원 2017.08.24 2017고단758

-인천지방법원 2017.07.06 2017고단3131