logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.05.31 2017고단106
부정수표단속법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of three years and a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at a means of flooding, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at a detention center on February 21, 2016.

"2017 Highest 106"

1. On January 13, 2017, the Defendant, in violation of the Regulation of Illegal Trees, attempted to forge a watermark to raise entertainment expenses, living expenses, etc., issued 1 copy of a check to the post office in the name of the Defendant at the Dandong post office located in the Dondong-dong in the Donnam-si, Gunn-si, North Korea, Gunn-do. On January 13, 2017, the Defendant purchased a knife knife with the Defendant at the Dondong-dong post office in the name of the Defendant.

At around 10:00 on the same day, the Defendant continued to forge 31 copies of the face check in front of the self check issued using the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife F.

2. Exercising forged securities;

A. On January 16, 2017, the Defendant wishes to enter into an international marriage consulting company “J” operated by the International Marriage Consulting Company on the fifth level H in the Donsan-si, Donsan-si, Y.

Cambodia introduced a female member of Cambodia, and prepared a membership agreement, and then delivered one copy of the check, as described in paragraph 1, to I, who is aware of the forgery of the check, as the admission fee.

B. On January 18, 2017, at around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) received alcoholic beverages and alcohol equivalent to KRW 100,000 to L from the main point of “M” operated by L in Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; and (b) issued one copy of the check, which was forged, to the victim who is unaware of the fact of forgery, under the pretext of payment for the amount of KRW 2.30,000,000, as described in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the Defendant exercised the forged pay securities over a total of twice.

3. Exercising false securities:

A. The Defendant on January 16, 201.

arrow