Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) known the victim F (23 years of age, female) in E D in Yangju-si; (b) took the victim’s her her tock back; (c) her her tock was bherd by her k's her k's k's k's k's k's b

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Where a judgment of conviction becomes final and conclusive on the facts constituting a sex offense subject to registration under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 32(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (amended by Act No. 11556, Dec. 18, 2012) and is obligated to submit personal information to the head of a police officer having jurisdiction over his/her domicile within 60 days from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive pursuant to Article 33 of the same

In principle, in a case where the accused who committed a sexual crime of determining whether to impose a complete program is convicted of a fine, an order to complete program shall be imposed in principle (Article 16(2) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes). However, in the summary order of the instant case, the accused did not impose an order to complete program, etc. on the accused, and only the accused requested a formal trial, the order to complete program is not imposed in accordance with the principle prohibiting disadvantageous changes under Article 457-2 of the Criminal Procedure Act (see Supreme Court Decision 201Do8736, Sept.