logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.07.16 2014고정731
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On January 16, 2014, around 05:40 on 05:40, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim D (the 53 years of age) to mix in the new wall hours; and (b) had a desire to commit an indecent act against the female, by creating a prudent.

Accordingly, according to the victim's behind, the Defendant committed an indecent act by talking her butt with another hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statement of the draft D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph CCTV images;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 47 and 49 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from Disclosure and Notification of Personal Information, and the proviso of Article 49(1) and the proviso of Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (which does not disclose or notify personal information in consideration of the initial crime, family relationship, previous circumstances, etc.) is a case where the defendant committed an indecent act by the victim's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

In principle, insofar as a sexual crime of determining whether to impose a complete program is convicted of a fine, an order to complete program ought to be imposed on the accused who committed a sexual crime. However, in the summary order of the instant case, the accused did not impose an order to complete program, etc., and only the accused requested a formal trial, the Defendant is not subject to an order to complete program in accordance with the principle of prohibition of disadvantageous alteration under Article 457-2 of the Criminal Procedure Act (Supreme Court Decision 2012Do8736 Decided September 27, 2012). Personal information registration

arrow