logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.07 2015고단7903
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On February 25, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for larceny at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on May 28, 2015.

[2015 Highest 7903]

1. On November 16, 2015, the Defendant found the victim E around the “D” restaurant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on November 16, 2015, around 15:40, around November 16, 2015, and opened a entrance and enter the said restaurant, and 200 money in cash, approximately KRW 80,000,000,000, and one head of bank passbook, etc. were used for the victim’s hand room.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the building and stolen the victim's property.

[2016 Highest 349]

2. 2015. 12. 2. 자 건조물 침입 및 절도 피고인은 2015. 12. 2. 16:00 경 천안시 서 북구 F에 있는 피해자 G이 운영하는 ‘H’ 식당에 이르러, 열려 있던 출입문을 통하여 그 내부에 들어간 다음 그 곳 계산대 아래에 있던 피해자 소유의 시가 30만 원 상당의 샤넬 장 지갑 1개, 현금 152,000원이 들어 있는 시가 80만 원 상당의 루 이비 통 가방 1개 합계 1,252,000원 상당을 가지고 나왔다.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the building and stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 7903: Crimes of Decision 1]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of E [2016 Height 349: Crimes listed in Decision 2]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G statements;

1. On-site and photographs of damaged articles (before judgment);

1. (A) the application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and the Acts and subordinate statutes on the acceptance/collection status of individuals;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment (abundance of a structure, a choice of imprisonment), and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (abundance of a structure, and a choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. A person who did not state the amount of damage caused by the Defendant’s crime of sentencing for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the aggravated concurrent crimes, and on November 16, 2015 among them.

arrow