Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 4. 2. 경 장소를 알 수 없는 곳에서 인터넷 E의 ‘F' 라는 제목의 기사에 접속하여 비방의 목적으로 사실은 피해자 G과 그 가족의 학력, 사생활 등에 대하여 전혀 알지 못하고, 확인한 사실이 없음에도 피해자 G의 동거인인 피해자 H을 지칭하며 ' 너 네 엄마 첩이야 중졸에 전교 꼴찌 라며 외할머니도 첩이라며 요즘 애들 어려도 다 알지 니가 일진하며 놀았던 거 니 딸이 고대로 죄받아 왕따 되게 생겼네

From that time to August 24, 2016, by posting the phrase “from that time,” up to that time, up to September 24, 2016, up to nine times, published false information via an information and communications network, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, thereby impairing the honor of the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A certificate of conferment of a degree by the Director General of the J University, and a certificate of the registration of the position of the Director General of the K University;

1. A certificate (144 pages of evidence records);

1. The list of comments on the accused party and the closure of the comments on the accused party's complaint;

1. Protocols and records of the examination of witnesses G of Seoul Central District Court 2017 High Court Order 7789;

1. Recording files for the examination of witnesses of Seoul Northern District Court 2017 High Court 2017 High Court 2048;

1. Recording record of the examination of witnesses of Seoul Central District Court 2017 High Court 2721, 2017 High Court 2754 and 2754;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in writing of recording of the examination of a witness to the witness L, 2017, 1839, Suwon Friwon;

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. for Criminal Facts and the Punishment Therefor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Summary of the assertion

A. There is no proof that the writing written by the defendant is false.