Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 11. 16. 경 불상의 장소에서 스마트 폰으로 B 사이트에 아이디 ‘C ’으로 접속한 뒤 ‘D’ 라는 제목의 기사에 ‘ 그러니까요 직원들은 전쟁이라는 둥 위기 감 고조시키고 지는 첩년 전용기 태워 쇼핑 보내랴, E이 일당한테 삥 뜯기고, 가지가지‘ 라는 내용의 댓 글을 게시하는 등 그 때부터 2016. 11. 28. 경까지 별지 범죄 일람표 (1) 기 재와 같이 총 3회에 걸쳐 댓 글을 게시하였다.

However, the victim F had not allowed the above victim G to use the H's aircraft for private purposes, such as shopping, etc., and there was no fact of restriction upon introduction of the victim G with disguised psychological adviser during the number of years in 2003.

For the purpose of defamation, the Defendant posted false information about the victim F and G through an information and communications network on three occasions, thereby impairing the honor of the victims, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Data to capture defamation posts and news articles (D);

1. A photograph (I) of a photograph by capturing comments on comments and by capturing comments on comments (this d: I);

1. Investigative report (the number of suspects), a search and seizure warrant, reply and data analysis (the number of suspects), and a warrant of search and seizure verification;

1. Investigative report (BAD latest access IPs by J and appendix of data), J-Linking IPs;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the recording record (Seoul Central District Court Act, 2017, 2721, 2721), record record (Seoul Central District Court Act, 2017, 2754, 2017, 2754), L Examination Record and Trial Record (2017, 1839, 2017, 7789, 201, 2017, 2017, 2017, 3000,000) and record

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., of Criminal Facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant of the Provisional Payment Order.