The Defendants jointly and severally share the Plaintiff A with KRW 20,00,000, and KRW 10,000,000 for each of them to Plaintiff B and C, and each of them on September 2019.

In fact, Defendant D established the H Association as a representative of G around January 10, 2017 and operated the I Training Institute (hereinafter “instant Training Institute”) from February 2017.

Defendant E was working as a mental leader of the instant training center, and Defendant F was working as a member since the establishment of the instant training center.

J (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) regularly visited the instant training center from February 2017 to regularly conduct life training as an investor who has a stake in the instant association. On September 22, 2019, the Plaintiff died after entering the instant training center as a serious light-setting.

Plaintiff

A is the deceased's spouse, and the plaintiff B and C are the deceased's children.

The Defendants: (a) around September 2, 2019, around September 2, 2019, installed a screen with the sign “Prohibition of Access” attached to the stairs listed on the third floor training room of the instant training center, where the deceased’s body was kept, and (b) up to October 15, 2019, up to October 15, 2019, the training center members of the instant training center were in the construction of the third floor training room; (c) prohibit the deceased’s body from being exposed to alcohol; and (d) prevent smells generated from the decomposition of the deceased’s body by means of spraying the deceased’s body into alcohol and installing toward the body around the body; and (e) prevent the spread of the body within the training center of the instant case, and caused other people to not easily discover

In addition, on October 9, 2019, in order for the plaintiff A to verify the death of the deceased, the defendant D and E have died at the training center of this case on September 1, 201, and recovered consciousness and have been sold to the treatment that can not be sprinked and sprinked.

‘False speech' and ‘A’ made a false statement to the effect that the status of the deceased was good for the plaintiff A who was found again on October 12, 2019, and caused the plaintiff A to return to their original status without finding the body.

In addition, the defendant D was dispatched to the police after receiving the report of the plaintiff A around 15:50 on October 15, 2019.