Defendant

All A and prosecutor appeals are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (20 years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. Prosecutor 1) Defendant A (hereinafter “Defendant A”) by the lower court against Defendant A

The sentence imposed on Defendant B is too uneasible and unfair. 2) The court below found Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) not guilty on the ground that he participated in the crime of abandonment of the dead body of Defendant A, who is a punishment, with the knowledge that Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) would have a dead body in a paper stuff, and thus, it erred in the misapprehension of facts.

2. Determination

A. On November 17, 2015, at around 22:26, Defendant A, the summary of the facts charged against Defendant B, as to the prosecutor’s argument of mistake of facts as to Defendant B, left the body sealed in front of the house, and left the body in front of the house with Defendant B, which is one of his own possession, parked in front of the house. On November 18, 2015, the Defendants set the cargo onto the front of the K K main factory in J in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the lower court determined that Defendant B moved the cargo onto the front of the factory and the front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the CCTV. While Defendant A entered the above factory in front of the CCTV, the lower court stated that Defendant B moved the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the above factory in front of the body in front of the Defendant in front of the vehicle in front of the lower court.