1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts of the written decision of the court of first instance shall be written in four pages.

subsections and d.

The part of the port shall be dried as follows:

『다. 위자료 1) 참작사유: 이 사건 사고 발생의 경위와 결과, 망인의 나이 및 과실의 정도, 망인과 원고들의 관계, 형사합의금(30,000,000원)이 지급된 점 등 이 사건 변론에 나타난 여러 가지 사정 2 인정금액 ㈎ 망인: 40,000,000원 ㈏ 원고들 각 4,000,000원

D. Succession 1) Amount of inheritance: Inheritance amount of KRW 56,087,015 (2) : Each of the plaintiffs 18,695,671 won (=56,087,015 won x 1/3 of the inheritance portion x less than KRW 1/3 of the inheritance portion x less than KRW 1/3 of the inheritance portion) / evidence mentioned above ] The first instance court's decision of KRW 5 of the first instance court of "the significant facts in this court and the purport of the entire pleadings" is followed as follows.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at each rate of 15% per annum under the Civil Act from August 6, 2016 to May 31, 2017, which is the date of the ruling of the court of the first instance, where it is deemed reasonable to dispute as to the existence or scope of the defendant's obligation, as the plaintiffs seek against each of the 22,695,671 won (the inheritance amount of KRW 18,695,671, each of which is KRW 4,000,000) and as the plaintiffs seek, from August 6, 2016, the day following the day of service of a copy of the complaint of this case to the day of full payment.

[Attachment 6] A statement of calculating the amount of damages shall be written in attached Form 6 of the judgment of the first instance court.

3. If so, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit, and it exceeds the above recognized amount among the judgment of the first instance court which has partially different conclusions.