logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.08.14 2019고단2654
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12,000,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 11, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and two months for the crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) in the Seoggu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court on August 11, 2016, and completed the enforcement of the sentence in the 2nd prison of North Korea on September 15, 2017 and was punished five times for the same crime.

On May 10, 2019, the Defendant, even if not a person handling narcotics, put approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs in a single-use injection machine, and injected phiphones by dilution them into his arms, at the trade incompetence in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, about 21:00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A narcotics appraisal statement;

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. Report on prosecutor's investigation (calculated additionally);

1. Previous records of judgment: The application of criminal records, references to criminal records, reports on prosecution investigation (written judgments and personal confinement status) to statutes;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (Selection of Fines) concerning the relevant criminal facts and the selection of punishment on the narcotics, etc.;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is 4 times or more, and the defendant has been subject to punishment again during the same repeated period. However, as a result of the examination of the sentencing of this court, it is revealed that the defendant had been sufficiently living for one year and eight months after the previous release, and the defendant was able to take a scam in depth through the prison life for three months, and voluntarily expressed his intention to stop the scam for his family, and the defendant committed to lead the defendant continuously in mind so that he can get out of the snares of narcotics, and appeals against him.

arrow