A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

20,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On April 14, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jung-gu District Court, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months on April 22, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 3, 2018 during the suspended sentence period, which was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for causing bodily injury, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 30, 2018.

The Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, and thus is not a person handling narcotics, but is not able to handle the psychotropic drugs (one-name clopon; hereinafter referred to as “copon”).

1. On January 2018, the Defendant committed a crime in the middle of the Korean War on January 2018, 2018, the Defendant administered phiphones once by inserting the phiphones into a single scopic injection machine at the residence of the Defendant on the fourth floor of the JJ building, and dilution with water to the Defendant’s arms.

2. On January 28, 2018, around January 28, 2018, the Defendant administered a philophone in the above Defendant’s residence, and the philophone’s scopon once in the above manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Requests for appraisal, reports on requests for appraisal, and reports on requests for appraisal;

1. A report on investigation (calculated additional charges);

1. Previous convictions: Investigation reports (period of suspension of execution and confirmation of a separate final judgment), Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2018Gohap76, Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2018No1448, Supreme Court Decision 2018No148;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. is that there are a number of punishment for the defendant, and the quality of the crime in this case is not somewhat weak.

However, the defendant shows a attitude that the defendant repents and reflects the wrongness in the truth, and drug addiction is intended to stop narcotics.