Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the defendant B is above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On November 21, 2016, the Defendant, at around 21:50, 2016, performed drinking together with the victim F (53 Does) in the “E-ju shop” located in Kuju-si, and went through a dispute between the victim and the victim. The victim took part in the victim’s bridge because the victim took part in drinking away from the victim’s face and head to the point of view.

As a result, the defendant suffered multiple gamblings that require treatment for about 14 days.

B. On November 21, 2016, at around 22:20, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault incident at the “E located; (b) as seen above, the security guards belonging to the G District of the original police station G District called up upon receipt of a 112 report, intended to arrest B who interferes with a police officer’s legitimate performance of his/her duties as a current offender with the obstruction of the police officer’s performance of his/her duties; and (c) committed an assault, such as, for the purpose of interfering with the arrest, putting the said H on the police officer, walking the flick part of the said H with the view of interfering with the arrest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties related to arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. On November 21, 2016, Defendant B, at around 22:20, 2016, sought a statement from the witness of the instant assault case at the “E located,” and reported 112 that the assault case, such as the description of paragraph 1, occurred, Defendant B committed assault, such as taking a bath against the witness of the said assault case, taking a hand-on phone carried on his hand, and sprinking the h’s sprink with his hand, and sprinking and pushing the h’s eblance.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with H and F;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the option of punishment against the crime: Defendant B, who is a criminal defendant, under Articles 257(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act.