1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff who cited the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows each evidence submitted in the court of first instance, it is reasonable to find facts in the court of first instance and determine it.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

From the 6th bottom to the last eth of the 2nd eth eth eth eth eths as follows:

【Violation of the duty of good faith, duty of obey, and duty of maintenance of dignity all are subject to reprimand. 【Suspension from office’ in the 7th page 4th place shall be considered as a “salary reduction.”

9. 7-3 in attached Table 1.

subsections are listed as follows:

Where the degree of a violation of a violation of a violation of a duty and a violation of a type of a violation of a duty is serious and intentional, the degree of a violation of a duty is serious and gross negligence, or where the degree of a violation of a duty is weak and intentional, the degree of a violation of a duty is serious and transitional, or where the degree of a violation of a duty is weak and gross negligence, the degree of a violation of a duty

7. Violation of a duty to maintain dignity;

C. The plaintiff asserts that there is no violation of the duty of good faith in the dismissal of sexual harassment and removal from office and dismissal from office and additional reprimand determination, and that the subject of the duty of good faith of public officials under Article 56 of the State Public Officials Act and Article 48 of the Local Public Officials Act should be related to the performance of duty, and that there is no legal basis for the application of disciplinary reasons since the fact that causes of disciplinary action occurred after the day is irrelevant to the

In order to promote the public interest as much as possible and to prevent the disadvantage, the duty of care, good faith, and good faith is the most important duty imposed on the public official.