logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.08.27 2019누33691
정직처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff in the trial does not differ significantly from the argument in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's assertion even if the evidence submitted in the trial was examined again, is recognized as legitimate.

Therefore, the reasoning for this court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the first instance court’s first instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s

C) Furthermore, in light of the following circumstances, it is difficult to view that the instant disciplinary action has considerably lost validity by social norms, including the evidence and the purport of the entire arguments as to the determination of disciplinary action. ① According to Articles 4(2) [Attached Table 2] and 12(1) [Attachment Table 9, where the degree of misconduct is serious, transitional, or the degree of misconduct is weak due to abuse of authority among the breach of duty in good faith, if the degree of misconduct is serious, practical, or gross negligence. In the case of insult among the breach of duty to maintain dignity, a disciplinary action should be taken, and if the degree of misconduct is serious, practical, or gross negligence, the degree of delinquency is weak, and the degree of delinquency is weak, and the standard for disciplinary action should be determined. In the case of language violence, the “salary reduction” should be determined as the basic criteria for “in a position of a person who directs and supervises,” “in a case where a number of victims are subject to disciplinary action,” “in a case where disciplinary action,” and “an accident,” if any, etc.

arrow