A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of a low-priced vehicle B.

On March 13, 2013, the defendant driving the above vehicle around 00:05, and let the 4 annual mountain intersection in Busan City, Seosan-gu, Busan, to go straighten in the direction of the new Tririri-distance in the direction of the Busan Bridge.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service is equipped with signal at the accident site, and the defendant neglected his duty of care to drive in accordance with the new subparagraph but neglected to do so, and the defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and by negligence, the part of the damaged vehicle C-si driving in the direction of the Ansan-dong in Busan Viewing on the left side of the damaged vehicle C-si driving in front of the damaged vehicle, and the D-si driving in the same direction as the damaged vehicle on the left side of the damaged vehicle operated in the same direction as that of the victimized vehicle, caused the vehicle to rapidly drive in order to avoid collision with the victimized vehicle, and caused the back seat passenger E (n, 21 years old) to shock in the vehicle inside.

In such occupational negligence, the driver of the damaged vehicle suffered from injuries such as knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee, knee knee knee knee knee knee, etc., which requires two-day treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and report on a traffic accident;

1. Screenings by cutting a black and video screen;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so ordered in consideration of the following: (a) the defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognized his/her mistake and reflects his/her depth; (b) agreed with the victims after the prosecution; and (c) the defendant has no criminal record.