Text
Defendant
B Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant A and J respectively, Defendant N,O and P are punished by imprisonment of one year, and Defendant N, P and eight months respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B The director of the organization division of the D Workers' Union in Busan and Yangyang District Department (hereinafter referred to as the "D Workers' Support Branch"); Defendant N is an employee of the D Workers' Support Branch (hereinafter referred to as the "U Branch"); the joint representative of the Committee for the Countermeasures against Removal; Defendant P is an employee of U who is an employee of U.S. and U union; Defendant P is an employee of U branch; Defendant P is an employee of U branch; Defendant A is the representative of U branch; Defendant A is the head of the D Workers' Support Branch; and Defendant J is the head of the D Workers' Support Branch; and Defendant J is the head of the D Workers' Support Branch.
U Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “U”) employed 1,378 employees in V and engaged in W business. From the second half of 2008 to December 15, 2010, U reported the human resources adjustment plan due to managerial reasons to the Labor Agency and notified the U Branch of U.S. on January 13, 201, and notified the workers of the pre-determination of dismissal and dismissed 170 workers on February 14, 201.
Accordingly, Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment repeatedly continued to engage in part and electric wave over 88 times from E to 17 December, 2010. From December 20, 2010, Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment began to enter into a indefinite full-scale strike by asserting "cancellation of reorganization dismissal" and on December 28, 2010. From January 6, 2011, Union and Labor Relations Union Federation of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter "Private Labor Union Federation") began to engage in the agricultural nature of 85 Creck, and Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment began to take place on January 20, 201.
On June 27, 2011, the Gu and February 14, 2011 continued to comply with the lock-out measures, and continue to hold in the atmosphere and in the inside and outside of the company, and decided to withdraw the full-time strike and return to work upon agreement between the company and the Labor Relations Commission on June 27, 2011. However, in contrast, X et al. claiming the withdrawal of layoff continued to be deaf while occupying V85, and the dismissed continue to hold an opposing assembly every day before V, and the labor-management dispute is in accordance with the labor-management agreement on November 10, 201.