logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.06.29 2017고단700
전기통신금융사기피해방지및피해금환급에관한특별법위반등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years, Defendant B and C, respectively;

2.Provided, That this judgment has become final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Telecommunications financial fraud organizations to which the upper line, etc. using the ID referred to as "I" belongs will make loans or substitute loans by phone call to many unspecified victims.

It is an organization composed of telephone inducement team, crime account, and head of the Tong recruitment team that recruits the victim by fraud by fraud, etc., and the delivery team that delivers the collected head of the Tong to the team while keeping the collected head of the Tong, and the withdrawal team that withdraws the damaged amount deposited into the crime account and deposits into the organization.

Defendant

A, on February 2, 2017, he/she received a proposal from the upper line with his/her name and the upper line with the Internet to give 5% of the withdrawn amount when he/she withdraws the amount of damage caused by the phishing crime, and conspired in order with the intent to work as the withdrawn team.

Meanwhile, on March 2, 2017, Defendant B, Defendant C, and the J conspiredd to assist in the crime of telecommunications fraud by receiving 300,000 won per day from an employee in charge of telecommunications fraud in the name of the first police officer (Defendant B and J from March 2, 2017, Defendant C from March 6, 2017, and from an employee in charge of telecommunications fraud in the name of the above employee in charge of telecommunications fraud in receipt of a physical card or passbook under the name of another person from an employee in charge of Kwikkset Service’s service in the name of the employee in charge of telecommunications fraud, and then concealing it at a place directed by the upper line.

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant, etc., on March 7, 2017, pursuant to the above public offering, introduced the victim K (56 years of age, 56) as a substitute loan employee by posting a telephone at a place where the location cannot be known, and then, “on repayment of the loan in use, the cash transfer is made to the account that he/she notifies him/her of the lending at a low interest rate,” and “on repayment of the loan in use, the Defendant, etc., was in violation of the Special Act on the Prevention of Damage to Telecommunications Finance and the Refund of Damage, and fraud 1).”

arrow