logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.07.21 2016고단2622
전기통신금융사기피해방지및피해금환급에관한특별법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

An organization of telecommunications fraud, which is managed by the general responsibility of name 2016 upper group 2622, is an organization composed of a Messen inducing team that analyzes money from the injured party after hackinging the Messenger as if the injured party was the victim, a solicitation team that recruits the money to be used for committing the crime, and a team that withdraws the money deposited in the Messen account and withdraws the money deposited into the Messen account.

At the end of March 2016, the Defendants received proposals from D, a member of the above organization, to collect money if the Defendants were to be a team to withdraw from the said organization, and followed such proposals, thereby raising funds in order to restrain telecommunications frauds with the members of the organization.

Accordingly, on April 6, 2016, “E” as the manager of the withdrawal team of the said organization: (a) performed in the name of the account in F, F, which was held around April 6, 2016, as if the Defendants were to be a modern capital employee, and (b) ordered the Defendants to receive the amount of damage from telecommunications fraud deposited into the G account and deliver the amount of damage to the remittance of the said organization; (b) while waiting in accordance with the instructions, the Defendants were hackinged in advance at around April 6, 2016 at an irregular place.

H Compared to the “Ntt” which is a Meet program using the personal information of I, the director of the international shipping company, and then connected to the “Ntt” which is an employee of the customs broker office operated by the victim J, the transaction partner of the above company, and, as it is impossible to transfer the withdrawal account rapidly, 12 million won to the national bank M account in the name of L, and 28 million won to the G bank N account in the name of G, because it is impossible to transfer it by erroneously dividing the withdrawal account number on five occasions, and transfer it to the said K to the above bank account in the name of G, and transfer KRW 12 million to the national bank account in the name of the above L through the Internet bank. Defendant A is one of the financial team staff.

arrow