logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.07.29 2016고단3226
전기통신금융사기피해방지및피해금환급에관한특별법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant 1 through 3 of seized evidence.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Telecommunications financial fraud organizations to which one-person ‘D', etc. belongs will provide a loan to an unspecified number of unspecified victims.

It is an organization composed of telephone inducement team, crime account, and head of Tong recruitment team that recruits damage funds by means of fraud or misrepresentation of investigation agencies, and withdrawal team that withdraws the damage funds deposited into the crime account and deposits into the organization.

Defendant

A around the beginning of December 2015, upon introduction of D’s “D” from the Defendant’s friendship E, the Defendant was willing to take the withdrawal of the amount by 3% of the withdrawal when withdrawing the amount of damage caused by the phishing crime. Defendant B was willing to take the withdrawal from the said “D” as the withdrawal team upon receipt of a proposal.

Before the telephone incentive team belongs to the victim, the telephone incentive team solicited the face-to-face account from the head of the Tong recruitment team and delivered it to the withdrawal team. The withdrawal team received the passbook connected to the face-to-face account from the head of the Tong recruitment team, the head of the passbook connected to the face-to-face card, and the organization waiting to promptly withdraw the face-to-face deposited into the large account immediately after the crime of the telephone inducement team, and the Defendants conspired to collect the face-to-face from the above telecommunications fraud team as the withdrawal team in order.

1. Violation of a special Act on the Prevention of Damage to Telecommunications Finance and the Refund of Damage, and Fraud;

A. On December 16, 2015, the steering staff of the telecommunications finance incentive team at the call of the above telecommunications finance fraud team is falsely misrepresented as the victim F by phoneing the victim F at the sloping land on December 16, 2015, and the victim is able to borrow a loan of KRW 25 million at a low interest rate.

The loan will be made if the loan company deposits KRW 10 million with the loan.

“Falsely speaking,” and its affiliated position is 5 million won with the post office H account in the name of G, which is the large account from the injured party, and i.e. the one.

arrow