Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants: (a) the victim E (63 years of age) was found to have worked and demanded the repayment of the loan while drinking alcohol as seen earlier around 14:50 on April 9, 2016; (b) the Defendants had been working for the Defendants; and (c) whether there was any conflict between the Defendants; and

The defendant A did not have to complete the payment with the victim in a dispute with the victim, and the defendant A her freshed the fresh with the fresh with the fresh with the fresh of the victim, and her fresh with the fresh with the fresh of the victim, and the defendant B fred with the fresh with the fresh with the fresh of the victim

As a result, the Defendants jointly carried out a scarcity of a scarcity that requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The defendants asserted that the victim's flaps were flabed with the victim's flab, but the victim's flab with the flab was not flabed with the flab.

그러나 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, ① 피해자가 비교적 일관되고 구체적으로 피해사실에 대하여 진술하고 있는 점, ② 이 사건 직후 경찰서에 가서 찍은 피해자의 사진상 목과 그 바로 아래 가슴 부위가 벌겋게 되어 있는 점, ③ 피해자는 이 사건 당일이 토요일이었던 관계로 월요 일인 2016. 4. 11. 병원에 가서 진단서를 발급 받게 되었고 그 진단서의 병명이 흉곽 전벽의 타박상, 목의 기타 부분의 표재성 손상, 타박상 등으로 기재되어 있어 피해 자의 당시 상해 사진과 일치하는 점 등을 종합하면, 이 사건 공소사실이 인정된다.

Therefore, the defendants and defense counsel's arguments are not accepted.

[Application of Acts and subordinate statutes]

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for negligence

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: each of them.