Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and a fine of 2,00,000 won, respectively.

The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B, around April 15, 2016, the Defendant argued that the victim A (40 years of age) was fluored on the front of the bus stop located in Busan Northern-gu, Busan, on the ground that the victim A (40 years of age) was fluored on the road in front of the bus stop located in 235, on April 15, 2016, Defendant B brought the victim’s face fluor, fluoring the victim’s fluor, cutting the victim’s fluor, cutting the victim’s fluor, cutting the fluor, kne face, and the kne part of the chest, etc., without knowing the number of days of treatment on the face and the part of the victim’s face.

2. Defendant A set up against the victim B (28 taxes) at the same time and place as above, and laid down the victim’s blue blue with blue blue, and blue the part of the victim’s blue blue with the part of the victim’s blue blue, and blue the part of the victim’s blue blue with

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant B in the first trial record;

1. The witness B and E respective legal statements (as to the defendant A);

1. Bluckings video (a net 14);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: each of the Defendants, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines

2. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: each of them, Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act.

3. Defendants of the provisional payment order: each of the above Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Defendant A and his defense counsel] asserts that Defendant A’s act constitutes a legitimate defense, as it is aimed at defending the unjust attack of Defendant B above.

According to the evidence mentioned above, Defendant A and Defendant B had a mutual threat during the operation of the vehicle at the expense of the vehicle in operation, and Defendant A had first loaded his vehicle on the side, and they started with his body fighting with Defendant B’s vehicle located on the side after getting off the vehicle on the side, and Defendant A, in the course of his body fighting, attempted to scam the neck of Defendant B first while trying to scam the neck of Defendant B, and continued to have his body fighting thereafter, as stated in its reasoning.