The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head of the E Federation of Organizations E, and Defendant B is the head of the F Branch of the E Federation.

From July 14, 2012 to 15:20 on July 7, 2012, Defendants planned to interfere with the victim H by force to stop conducting funeral services, by holding off cryp, etc. on the floor in the Gosi-gu G Ground Report in Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

Accordingly, Defendant A was unable to sell flags by blocking pedestrians who passed the Dong dong on the street store around the street store of the victim so that they can not access the street store.

Defendant

B, along with Defendant A, taken video images using a cell phone around the victim’s street setting.

Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the victim's occupation business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendants' statement on the second trial date at court

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. A fine of 500,000 won to be imposed for a suspended sentence;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the reflection of sentence, the fact that the form of interference seems to be relatively insignificant, the circumstances that may be considered in the course of committing the crime, and the fact that there exists an agreement with the victim, etc.);