logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.09.06 2013고정800
업무방해
Text

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, B, and C are the vice-chairperson of the “L (L) merchants’ association in Asia-si; Defendant D is the general secretary; Defendant E is the 1st block team leader; Defendant F is the 5st block team leader; Defendant G, and H are the auditors; Defendant I and J members.

1. On February 19, 2013, the Defendants: (a) convened an urgent temporary meeting of the merchants’ association on the grounds of the following reasons: (b) around 10:00 on February 14, 2012 at the L Merchants’ office located in K in ASEAN-si; (c) fights with the merchants by the victimO under the influence of ordinary alcohol; (d) raising suspicions that the president and the general NO embezzled the merchant membership fees; and (e) raising suspicions that the president and MO embezzled the merchant membership fees; and (e) filing complaints and complaints with the ASEAN-si and the ASEAN-si Police Station, thereby preventing the victims from being expelled at the merchants’ association and deprived of the funeral.

On February 19, 2013, M and N have accumulated 5 square meters of concrete materials (130cm x 130cm x 115cm) on the 2nd 12st jum of the above L 2nd 12, which is a location where the victim's street store is installed.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with M and N and interfered with the victim's street store business by force.

2. On March 9, 2012, Defendants who interfered with the business of March 2012, 2012: (a) observed that the victim was moving the concrete blindle as set forth in paragraph (1) to the next vacant spot; (b) and (c) decided at the said merchant’s office to prevent the victim from moving the above blindle to the front spot of the victim; and (d) again, to prevent the victim from performing the funeral.

Since then, M and N moved 5 of the above concrete square meters from March 9, 2012 to the base of the next victim at around 06:00.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with M and N and interfered with the victim's street store business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the Defendants and P

1. Each police statement of theO;

1. Each complaint;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Emergency ad hoc minutes:

arrow