logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.06.16 2015고단3143
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2015, the Defendant issued an order to F (0 years of age 60) who is an employee within the “E cafeteria” operated by Kimhae-si on September 2, 2015, to F (0 years of age 60).

J. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W.

The facts charged were appropriately revised and supplemented to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's exercise of his right of defense, such as "A was put on the floor if he was on the table of the table on the ground of "B", and the vehicle of the boomer, etc. was obstructed by approximately 20 minutes of the above restaurant business by the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of internal investigation reports and field photographs-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged was assaulted by the Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as the preceding paragraph, on the ground that the Victim F was f in good faith and f in good faith, on the ground that the Victim F was f in good faith and care.

2. This part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it can be known that the victim F after the institution of the instant prosecution, expressed his/her intention not to punish the defendant. Thus, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow