A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 3, 2014, around June 3, 2014, the Defendant, B, and C agreed to receive insurance proceeds by filing a false report with the insurance company that: (a) the Defendant, as the victim; (b) the Defendant, as the perpetrator, was involved in the E-car accident owned by D; and (c) the Defendant, as the perpetrator.

On June 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received false accident from an employee in charge of the victim Samsung F, Samsung F, who had been parked at the front of the house, that “I would have become aware of the vehicle that was parked at the front of the house,” and (b) received treatment from the H Hospital located in G at the time of Sinsi.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have been driving at the time and did not have any shock of D.

The Defendant, B, and C conspired, thereby deceiving a person in charge of the victim company as above, and acquired 397,280 won from the victim company by receiving 397,280 won as stated in attached Table 1, a year of crime inundation, under the pretext of agreement and treatment in D.

2. On June 17, 2014, the Defendant and the Defendant, I, J, K, and C co-principaled the Defendant, B, I, J, K, and C, as well as C, intended to receive insurance proceeds by filing a false report with the insurance company on the ground that there was a traffic accident due to negligence after intentionally shocking the Lunsta car driven by I into the rash car such as the preceding paragraph.

On June 17, 2014, I set up a three-lane road in front of Sungnam-si M, Sungnam-si, and I intentionally shocked the back portion of the said rocketing car by driving a rash car with the Defendant.

After that, B, aboard a radar car, was transferred to the above rocketing car, and the defendant, the defendant, in the driver's seat of the above radar car, conducted a false accident to the employee in charge of the victim Samsung F&M on the same day by pretending that the other defendant caused the above accident. On the other hand, B, in order to conceal that it is the owner of the above radar car.