logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.07.09 2015고단489
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for four months, for defendant E with prison labor for six months, for defendant F with prison labor for eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On December 31, 2013, Defendant A and H conspiredd to receive insurance proceeds by filing a false report with the insurance company on the fact that Defendant A and H were faced with the KS car driven by Defendant A and the victim, respectively, from the front day of the house of Defendant H located in the Si/Ma-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, as the perpetrator, and Defendant H was appointed as the victim, respectively.

Defendant

A accepted a false accident that “the victim Samsung Fire, Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Tropic fire”) was an employee who could not know the name of the victim Samsung Fire, Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Tropic fire”) at the same place on the same day,” and Defendant H received medical treatment at the M Hospital located in Sungnam-si L.

However, in fact, Defendant A did not have been driving at the time, and Defendant A did not have any shocked with Defendant H.

Defendant

A and H, as above, by deceiving the victim, received 756,70 won from the victim as shown in attached Table 1, such as the victim's list of crimes No. 1, under the name of the medical expenses and agreement of the defendant H, and acquired it by fraud.

B. Defendant A, E, and N jointly committed a crime on or around June 3, 2014, Defendant A, and N jointly resided in the place of the house where Defendant A and E reside together with the State of king-si on or around June 3, 2014, Defendant A and N as the victim, N as the perpetrator, and P as the victim.

The insurer, which caused the accident by shocking the rash car as stated in the port, has made a false report to the insurer to receive the insurance money.

N accepted the false accident that “the parked vehicle was cut off after the vehicle was known,” at the same place on the same day, N received the false accident that “P was treated at the R Hospital located in Q Q in Q at the time of stimulation.”

However, the N did not have been driving at the time, and there was no shocking P.

Defendant

A, E, and N are deceiving victims as above and deceiving them.

arrow