1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 22,027,025 as well as KRW 11,581,359 as to the Plaintiff from October 28, 2014 to the day of full payment.

In full view of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 11, the defendant acquired loans from Hyundai Capital, National Card, Gags Capital, and Citti Bank, etc. and did not repay its debts, and thereafter, the plaintiff acquired the above loans from Hyundai Capital, National Card, Gags Capital, and Cit Bank, etc., and the plaintiff acquired the above loans from the defendant, and the defendant's debts amounting to 22,027,025 won (total of principal 11,581,359 won) as of October 27, 2014.

Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 22,027,025 won and 11,581,359 won with interest rate of 17% per annum from October 28, 2014 to the date of full payment.

The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant received a loan from the SBI Savings Bank and the HBI Savings Bank and did not repay the loan obligations, and that the Plaintiff acquired the above loan obligations from the said SBI Savings Bank and HBI Savings Bank. However, as to the fact that the Defendant received a loan from the SBI Savings Bank, it is not sufficient to acknowledge the Defendant’s computerized statement of No. 4, which is merely the head of the financial institution’s computerized ledger, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. As to the fact that the Defendant received a loan from HI Capital, the Defendant’s signature under the evidence No. 9, which is a loan transaction contract prepared between HI Capital and the Defendant, as well as the signature and land under the other loan transaction contract (No. 7 and No. 8-1 of the evidence No. 8) is not trusted, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

The plaintiff's claim is reasonable within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.