Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment with prison labor for violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act in the Incheon District Court's Branch Branch, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 2, 2017.

No owner of a motor vehicle shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, around October 5, 2014, the Defendant operated the said motor vehicle without mandatory insurance for a total of eight times from around the following day to May 20, 2017, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, in front of the Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Uniform Park.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Inquiry into the details of non-insurance operations vehicle inquiry, mandatory insurance contract inquiry, and traffic regulations conducted;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry into residents' records of criminal history, and application of a copy of each written judgment (in Incheon District Court Branch of the Incheon District Court, 2017 High Court, 1588 High Court, 2017 High Court Decision 1700 (Joint));

1. Relevant legal provisions and the main sentence of Article 46(2)2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (Amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015); the choice of fines; the main sentence of Article 46(2)2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act; and the choice of fines, respectively.

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (limited to concurrent crimes with punishment prescribed for the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act as of May 20, 2017, whichever is the largest penalty and penalty);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant did not purchase mandatory insurance and operated his own vehicle, and that the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime.