logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2020.08.18 2019고단1756
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two years and fine for 200,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 1756"

1. On August 22, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license).

On September 5, 2019, at around 18:26, the Defendant driven an Epoter truck under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.228% of alcohol level without obtaining a driver’s license from around 500 meters to around D’s license on the “C” restaurant located in Hadong-gun B, Hanam-do.

Accordingly, the defendant has driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate an automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph (1) above, operated the E-mail truck, which was not covered by mandatory insurance.

"200 Highest 77"

1. Around 14:00 on January 8, 2020, the Defendant was driving Epoter cargo under the influence of alcohol with approximately 500 meters alcohol concentration of 0.097% without obtaining a driver’s license from his own dwelling place in H to H via H in the Hadong-gun, Hadong-gun, from his dwelling place to H in the Hadong-gun, and without obtaining a driver’s license.

Accordingly, the defendant was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the Road Traffic Act prohibition regulations at least twice without obtaining a driver's license.

2. Although the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the Defendant operated the E-mail vehicle at the date and time and place indicated in the preceding paragraph, which was not covered by the mandatory insurance for motor vehicles.

"200 Highest 167"

1. A defendant who has violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (not after-accident) shall drive the E-freight;

arrow