A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 21, 2013, from around 21:50 on the same day to around 22:10 on the same day, the Defendant issued a defective statement to the effect that “E” is working within the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and that he/she drinks with the birth and drinking that he/she became aware of, and that he/she does not mislead the horses, the victim would restrain him/her from doing so, and that “I must calculate the drinking value and you need to do so.”

Accordingly, the Defendant, by breaking the tables inside the restaurant, broken the blick, etc., dump the victim’s dump with each hand, dump the victim’s dump, and dump the victim’s hump, and hump the victim’s hump, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by leaving the customers who want to enter the restaurant, such as hump, hump, and hump, with the victim’s hump.

On February 10, 2014, at around 00:25, the Defendant conspiredd that the victim H (29 years of age) was false in front of the GPC bank located in the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, the Defendant committed each assault against the victims of the vehicle, who continued to see the breath of the victim H’s breath, was able to kill the breath of the breath, shake the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of the police officer regarding I;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of statutes, such as photographs on damage;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defense counsel's assertion on the defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act asserts to the effect that the defendant committed a crime under the state of mental and physical disability while under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of interference with the business of this case.