Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendants are relatives of friendship.
1. On April 25, 2017, around 19:40 on April 25, 2017, the Defendants sent the same attitude that they would normally pay the alcohol value to the victim D Operation D in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, and ordered the victim to provide alcohol, alcohol, etc.
However, in fact, the Defendants did not have the intention or ability to pay the drinking value.
In collusion, the Defendants were provided with rhythm and rhythm of the market value of 78,000 won from the injured party.
2. The Defendants, in collusion, interfered with the operation of the restaurant for the victim for about 40 minutes, committed an act, such as intending to take the victim’s bath at the time, place, and attempt to take the hand, and interfered with the operation of the restaurant for the victim.
3. On April 25, 2017, Defendant A was asked about the reasons why he did not pay the drinking value from the police officer G and policeman belonging to the Busan Central Police Station F District of the Police Station G and the police officer of the Busan Central Police Station, who was called upon a 112 report at the above location on April 25, 2017. Defendant A was able to ask questions about the reasons that he did not pay the drinking value from H, and Defendant A was able to look back with G in both hands by her hand, and he was scam of the above G, and was scam by cutting off the back the left part of the above G with a bad hand. Defendant B was scambling in that part, and Defendant B was scambling to the above G and H.
Defendant
A A From around 20:55 on the same day, “Nr.s.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s.s. n.s.s.s.
In order to hear the word “Ahh,” “Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. The application of each police statement law to D and H.