1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The Plaintiff is the child of B and C, and C (G) is the primary mother, and the I Hospital located in Ulsan-gu H on August 8, 201, Ulsan-gu (hereinafter “instant hospital”).

(2) Defendant D is the operator of the hospital, Defendant E is the father and the director of the childbirth within the hospital in charge of the Plaintiff’s pre-industrial diagnosis from the pre-industrial diagnosis to the delivery of the Plaintiff, and Defendant F is the director of the juvenile center within the hospital in charge of the treatment after the Plaintiff’s birth.

B. At around 01:20 on April 6, 2012, the 1st day of pregnancy, C, around 39 weeks, both sides are cut off prior to the commencement of the operation, regardless of the early number of pregnant women, regardless of the number of pregnant women. In other words, prior to the outbreak of the operation, C means the first time before the operation of the operation of the operation, the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation.

3) From around 08:00 on April 6, 2016, Defendant E attempted only an induced portion to C by administering a penttopy. The opening price of the Gindo Gindo Gindo Gindo Gindo Gindo Gindo Gindo G in 200 on the same day due to the lack of change in the number of the Gindo Gindo Gindo Gindo G in 200m. (4) Defendant E ceased to administer a protopy on April 6, 2012, taking into account the possibility of infection due to a marcation, around 11:00 on the same day, around the same day, around 19:0 on the same day, and around 03:00 on April 7, 2012, Defendant E continued to administer a protopyidine, which is a protopy, to C on April 7, 2012.