logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.21 2012가합89400
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties A is a person born at the F Hospital operated by Defendant E (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and is currently suffering from the cerebral cerebral cerebral typosis, which is the scarbic dyslexic dysty.

Plaintiff

B is the father of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the mother of Plaintiff A.

Defendant D is a doctor who belongs to the Defendant Hospital and is in charge of the birth and management of newborns of Plaintiff A.

B. On December 4, 2009, Plaintiff C received a pregnancy diagnosis at the Defendant Hospital. Defendant D conducted a periodical pre-mortem examination to Plaintiff C on July 9, 2010 (36th 2). In light of the pregnancy progress (36th 2th 2th 201), the head of the fetus (3th 3th 2th 2th 201) was small, and the size of the fetus’s head (33th 2th 2th 2010) was small, expected body (2.4k g) was small, and the size of the fetus was small (34th 34th 3th 20th 3th 3th 20) was small, and Defendant D’s 20th 20th 205th 20th 20th 20.3rd 200.

At around 23:00, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital administered the Plaintiff’s protogram, a leading delivery system, to the Plaintiff C, and removed it at around 06:0 on August 16, 2010, and then administered the Rototogram, a protogram, a protogram for the promotion of delivery, around 07:00.

At around 06:00 on August 17, 2010, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital administered the Plaintiff C’s re-satisfytopy.

Plaintiff

C At around 10:30, the number of 4 cm-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-long-

At around 13:30, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital decided to suspend the progress of an induced delivery and conduct the king operation (hereinafter “instant operation”), in order to not facilitate the Plaintiff C’s self-satise care and not properly perform the intensity of the advanced head of the fetus.

3 The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital shall conduct the instant surgery at around 15:00 of the G date.

arrow