A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 11, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Sungnam Branch of Suwon Friwon on July 11, 2012. On January 25, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3,00,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Seoul Northern District Court and is still pending in the appellate trial

[Criminal facts]

1. On March 2, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.113% in blood without a driver’s license for a vehicle on March 2, 2018, and on March 22:16, 2018, the Defendant driven BMW car from the 2km section of Songpa-dong Seoul, Songpa-gu to the movement of Songpa-gu in Seoul.

2. On January 25, 2018, when the Defendant was found to be drunk by drinking at the time and place as described in the above paragraph (1), the Defendant had the mind that the Defendant would be disadvantageous in administrative litigation in relation to the case where he was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on Seoul Northern District on January 25, 2018.

Accordingly, the defendant stated "C" in the driver's column of the main driver's circumstantial statement report with a stampial color, and marks the defendant's name next to his name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged the driver's report column of the state driver's statement report under C, which is a private document on proof of facts.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph 1, discovered that he was aware of the forgery by drinking alcohol to a light-riding D at the time and place, and used a forged private document by delivering one copy of the driver’s circumstantial statement report which forged the driver’s disturbance to D as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving under drinking, inquiry into the results of crackdown on driving under drinking, notification of the results of crackdown on driving under drinking, the circumstantial statement of the driver under driving under drinking, and the driver under driving under drinking.