beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 2, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Seoul Northern District Court on March 2, 2012. On April 29, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million due to a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on April 29, 2014. On November 7, 2014, the Defendant was released on October 28, 2016 and the period of parole passed on January 27, 2017.
1. On April 16, 2018, the Defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking without a license) had been punished twice or more due to drinking driving, driving a car with a F mother-free driver’s license under the influence of alcohol with approximately 300 meters of alcohol level in the front of the E parking lot located in the same Gu D from C in the front of the Seoul Northern-gu Seoul Southern-gu, Seoul, around 22:53 on April 16, 2018.
2. The Defendant, at the aforementioned time, was found to have driven an official document at the same time, at the same place as above, and was asked to produce a driver’s license by the police officer G of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Police Station G, Seoul, and the Defendant denied the driver’s license, which is an official document, by presenting the driver’s license under the name of the Seoul National Police Agency Commissioner General of the Seoul National Police Agency, which was in possession, as if
3. The Defendant forged a private document at the above date, time, place, and for the purpose of uttering, stated “I” in the name column of the foregoing statement as “I” and affixed the Defendant’s seal on the back of the name.
Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged the statement report on the situation of the driver's driver in the name of the I, a private document concerning the proof of facts.
4. The Defendant’s event of the above investigation document is in the name I prepared to H in the above time, at the same time, and at the same place, he knew of the forgery.