beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a member in charge of the business of C.
1. Alteration of any private document;
A. On November 8, 2013, the Defendant read the test report (E) PEF document files using Defendant’s computer at the office C, a corporation office located in 105 201 and 201, the Defendant arbitrarily published the test report from 2.5 to 9.5, “the thickness decrease rate due to the dynamic load” among the test report from 2.5 to 3-4, “the opical mine level” from 4-5 to 3-4, “the opical mine level” from 4-5 to 4-2-3, and “the opical mine level” from 4-5 to 2-3, and then output the opical test report using the opic test report as above.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant altered one copy of the test report under the name of the FITI Director.
B. The Defendant above A.
at the time and place described in the paragraph above 1.
In such a way as stated in the foregoing paragraph, the “mamb strength” value from March 3 to 691 to March 3, 991, from 3-4 to 5, damp 4-5, from 6 to 8, from 3-8 to 4, from among the test report (F) from the FITI test institute to e-mail, the numerical value of “mamb strength” was 4 to 5, from among the test report (F) files, and the numerical value of “mamb strength” was 6 to 8, from 4 to 5, and then printed out the test report using a local source.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant altered one copy of the test report under the name of the FITI Director.
2. On November 2013, the Defendant held two copies of the results of the alteration in the name of the Director of the FITI test and research institute, which was modified as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, at the office of H company located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, on the following grounds: (a) as if the alteration was duly formed, the Defendant held the same on the part of the officer I of H company who may know of such alteration.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. To describe and present each altered test report;