Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

A. On June 29, 2015, the Defendant infringed on a structure: (a) opened the first floor door of the E building under the control of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Victim D (the remaining, 58 years of age) located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and invaded upon the structure managed by the victim.

B. Around 00:25 on June 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) recommended the Defendant to return home to the police officer G, who is the police officer of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station, the police station, who was called out after receiving a 112 report that the host scambling in front of the building above E in front of the building; (b) the Defendant recommended the Defendant to return home; (c) the victim G, who is the police officer of the Seoul Young-gu Police Station, the owner of the building; and (d) the police officer dispatched to the police officer who called out, while complying with the foregoing, the Defendant “scam and scambling.” The head of the police station, who was called

E. Madern Madern Madar Madar Madar

The term "patently insulting the victim by openly booming the so called a large interest."

(c)

On June 29, 2015, from around 00:30 to 01:00, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was arrested as a current offender under the same circumstances as the above “B” within the Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station F box located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul; and (b) appealed against the employees inside the lawsuit, who raised a complaint against the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.

Whether or not he was faced with an unperson's death on the ground of his own.

G. The domination doctrine was notified.

The end shall be between the end.

In the case of civil petition, the government made a disturbance in the state of drinking for about 30 minutes, such as spitation of spits on the office floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The complaint filed by G and the police statement made by G in relation to G;

1. A written statement of the victim D;

1. Application of one statute to the scene of insult and the relevant field video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act, Articles 319 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1.Article 70(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.